Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DC Providers Cannot Have Medical M cards

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Blackcat31 View Post
    According to the articles I've read, there is no way to know if a person used marijuana 60 minutes or 24 hours prior to caring for children.

    There is no way to "know" if the person is under the influence at x time like you can "know" is a person used alcohol at x time by using a breathalizer or administering a blood test.

    Know what I mean?

    So since there is no way to know WHEN use happened, it is easier to just not allow use at all IF a person wants to be a licensed caregiver.

    That is not necessarily factual information. It's just what I've read so far.
    Okay thanks. I know what you mean now. Marijuana can be tested for but there are a lot of variables. It isn't practical. There is a urine and a mouth swab test for drugs as well.

    The thing is that if you know someone is high you really can't tell if they smoked weed, took harder drugs, are drunk with alcohol or took too many or a combination of prescription meds. I think the deciding factor would be ARE they high not what they are high ON. I see singling out marijuana as not being allowed in the home, if it is legal, to be problematic in that way. The same way as saying you can't have alcohol in the home cause you might get drunk while watching children seems no different to me than saying you can't have marijuana cause you might get high while watching children.

    Laurel

    Comment


    • #17
      Wow. This is a hard one. And probably will be hotly debated.
      I'm all for natural medicines, marijuana included.
      But I firmly believe that if you are taking a medication, no matter what form it's in, and it impairs your reflexes/judgment/alertness, etc., and you require this medication around the clock, then you shouldn't be in this business as a provider.
      I don't mean to offend anyone who uses medical marijuana. It's an awesome, and sometimes the only, alternative to manufactured drugs.
      But if I was a dc parent and knew my provider took medical marijuana or loricet or vicodin or anything that is a prescribed narcotic while my child was in her care, I'd be yanking my child out without a second thought.
      I would feel that she likely isn't capable of adequately supervising my child, meeting the needs of my child, providing a safe environment for my child, etc.
      The link to the website is very thorough in her documentation, but toward the end, it indicated that other people in the household were applying for and receiving M cards. This sounds fishy to me. One or two, maybe. But several adults? No, sounds like somebody just wants to get high.

      Comment


      • #18
        I am a registered provider in Oregon as well, and I think the whole thing is kinda ridiculous!*I mean, it doesn't state you can't just not use marijuana during childcare hours(which is completely understandable) but not be a MEDICAL marijuana card holder? You have to choose! Lots of people use for lots of different reasons, and just because you have a medical card doesn't mean you use it all day....But you can be prescribed Oxycotin, Methadone, or most any other medically prescribed drug and be a provider. Don't see what they are trying to achieve with this...Ill try to upload my letter...

        Comment


        • #19
          Here are the new Regs.

          (a) No person shall smoke or carry any lighted smoking instrument, including e-cigarettes in the family child care
          home or within ten feet of any entrance, exit, window that opens or any ventilation intake that serves an enclosed
          area, during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall use smokeless tobacco in the
          family child care home during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall smoke, carry
          any lighted smoking instrument, e-cigarettes or use smokeless tobacco in motor vehicles while child care children are
          passengers.
          (b) No one shall consume alcohol on the family child care home premises during child care hours or when child care
          children are present. No one shall be under the influence of alcohol on the family child care home premises during
          child care hours or when child care children are present.
          (c) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store illegal controlled substances on the
          family child care home premises. No one shall be under the influence of illegal controlled substances on the family
          child care home premises.
          (d) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store medical marijuana on the premises of
          the family child care home. No one under the influence of medical marijuana shall be on the family child care home
          premises.
          (e) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), marijuana plants, derivatives and associated paraphernalia shall not be
          kept on the family child care home premises.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Wubby View Post
            Here are the new Regs.

            (a) No person shall smoke or carry any lighted smoking instrument, including e-cigarettes in the family child care
            home or within ten feet of any entrance, exit, window that opens or any ventilation intake that serves an enclosed
            area, during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall use smokeless tobacco in the
            family child care home during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall smoke, carry
            any lighted smoking instrument, e-cigarettes or use smokeless tobacco in motor vehicles while child care children are
            passengers.
            (b) No one shall consume alcohol on the family child care home premises during child care hours or when child care
            children are present. No one shall be under the influence of alcohol on the family child care home premises during
            child care hours or when child care children are present.
            (c) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store illegal controlled substances on the
            family child care home premises. No one shall be under the influence of illegal controlled substances on the family
            child care home premises.
            (d) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store medical marijuana on the premises of
            the family child care home. No one under the influence of medical marijuana shall be on the family child care home
            premises.
            (e) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), marijuana plants, derivatives and associated paraphernalia shall not be
            kept on the family child care home premises.
            Idk about this. If you need medical marijuana and you are NOT under the influence while children are in your care, then it should be perfectly legal, the same as any other prescribed med. I understand they can't test for it with an accuracy of when it was consumed, but they can't do that either with say, loricet, either. It just shows up in your system with a drug test. The test doesn't indicate when it was actually put into your system. So why are they two things different?

            No one should be under the influence of either while caring for children, but I don't see how they are denying people the right to "possess or store" it when they can "possess and store" loricet.

            Comment


            • #21
              When I read section d, stating noone under medical marihuana shall be on the premises- wouldn't that exclude DCFamilies as well? So that would exclude any parent from being on-site to drop-off, pick-up, correct?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by TheGoodLife View Post
                When I read section d, stating noone under medical marihuana shall be on the premises- wouldn't that exclude DCFamilies as well? So that would exclude any parent from being on-site to drop-off, pick-up, correct?
                That's the way I read it.

                I'm just not sure on this one. I can see both sides.

                Comment


                • #24
                  I'm thinking that although marijuana can be used as pain relief it isn't categorized the same as some of the other pain relieving drugs that are allowable for use during care hours.

                  I think depending on what kind/type of drug a person is prescribed (opioids, stimulants etc) it defines whether or not they are "under the influence" and therefore dictates what they can and can't do.

                  Most of those types of drugs will state do not drive or operate heavy machinery etc during use.

                  Not all drugs have mind altering or sedation type affects, therefore their use during daycare or driving is allowed whereas others are not.

                  I suppose a person can drive just fine taking a prescription pain reliever such as codeine but can't do the same under the influence of marijuana so that may be where the discrepancy lies.

                  Which drugs can cause mind altering side effects and which ones have an affect only on the body but not the coherency of the person taking it...kwim?

                  Comment


                  • #25
                    Originally posted by Laurel View Post
                    If pot is legal then it should be treated like any other legal drug such as alcohol. If one is drunk or high on prescription meds while watching children then there are consequences. I'm not sure why pot is any different.

                    Laurel
                    I agree! But why does it have to be written in a rule book to have providers understand it's a bad idea to use on the job?

                    Comment


                    • #26
                      Originally posted by Wubby View Post
                      Here are the new Regs.

                      (a) No person shall smoke or carry any lighted smoking instrument, including e-cigarettes in the family child care
                      home or within ten feet of any entrance, exit, window that opens or any ventilation intake that serves an enclosed
                      area, during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall use smokeless tobacco in the
                      family child care home during child care hours or when child care children are present. No person shall smoke, carry
                      any lighted smoking instrument, e-cigarettes or use smokeless tobacco in motor vehicles while child care children are
                      passengers.
                      (b) No one shall consume alcohol on the family child care home premises during child care hours or when child care
                      children are present. No one shall be under the influence of alcohol on the family child care home premises during
                      child care hours or when child care children are present.
                      (c) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store illegal controlled substances on the
                      family child care home premises. No one shall be under the influence of illegal controlled substances on the family
                      child care home premises.
                      (d) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), no one shall possess, use or store medical marijuana on the premises of
                      the family child care home. No one under the influence of medical marijuana shall be on the family child care home
                      premises.
                      (e) Notwithstanding OAR 414-205-0000(5), marijuana plants, derivatives and associated paraphernalia shall not be
                      kept on the family child care home premises.
                      Thank you so so much for uploading these! I didn't even think of the regs just the letter we received-
                      Each day is a fresh start
                      Never look back on regrets
                      Live life to the fullest
                      We only get one shot at this!!

                      Comment


                      • #27
                        Originally posted by TheGoodLife View Post
                        When I read section d, stating noone under medical marihuana shall be on the premises- wouldn't that exclude DCFamilies as well? So that would exclude any parent from being on-site to drop-off, pick-up, correct?
                        Bingo! Thats exactly what I thought and my hubs and I had a discussion on this.

                        Probably though if they have been at work they aren't going to be under the influence of it.

                        Its going to be interesting when parents maybe aren't allowed to pick up/drop off. I think it will either be illegal again or something is going to have to happen to help us know if we can turn children over to the parents or not.
                        Each day is a fresh start
                        Never look back on regrets
                        Live life to the fullest
                        We only get one shot at this!!

                        Comment


                        • #28
                          Originally posted by Country Kids View Post
                          Bingo! Thats exactly what I thought and my hubs and I had a discussion on this.

                          Probably though if they have been at work they aren't going to be under the influence of it.

                          Its going to be interesting when parents maybe aren't allowed to pick up/drop off. I think it will either be illegal again or something is going to have to happen to help us know if we can turn children over to the parents or not.
                          The article posted above says:

                          The rule allows others who live in the home — but aren't licensed child-care providers — to hold medical marijuana cards, but the drug can't ever be stored in the home. It also bans use of smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes on the premises while children are present.

                          Applicants for child-care licenses are not currently asked whether they have medical marijuana cards, so the state knows only about those who volunteer the information, state officials have said.

                          State child-care licensors will not be able to check whether child care providers have medical marijuana cards because state law restricts access to the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program database, said Cindy Hunt, a lawyer for the Department of Education, which oversees child care.


                          So I am thinking parents dropping off and picking up will be excluded from the law.

                          It also says there is no way to check up on this and that surrendering your card is voluntary as the state currently has no way to cross check who has one and who doesn't.

                          Comment


                          • #29
                            I think it is only because, like someone else said, there is no way to be able to measure WHEN that said person took the drug. It remains in the system for long periods of time. So, if said provider took it at 7 pm after closing, it would still be in their system the next day. There is no way to prove that provider took drug while in hours not caring for children.

                            I have an ex-boyfriend (ten years ago now) who smoked it and drove home 4 hours later from his friends house. He then got pulled over on his way home, tested, and fined, along with his license taken away. Even though he wasn't technically "high" at the time he got pulled over (the effects hade worn off by then), there was no way to prove or disprove, so he got fined and ticketed.

                            Same goes for providers. If there was a way to prove or disprove when they used it, maybe the State would be more apt to allow it.

                            Just my thoughts though, it's possible that this has nothing to do with their decision as well.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X