Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Your Opportunity To Comment On "Universal Preschool" Proposed By Pres. Obama

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here's Your Opportunity To Comment On "Universal Preschool" Proposed By Pres. Obama

    I received this e-mail from the NAFCC - you'll note the link at the bottom to contact the White House, if anyone is interested.

    Please join the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC) in applauding President Obama for the aggressive legislative agenda that he proposed during the State of the Union speech on February 12, 2013.

    "In States that make it a priority to educate our youngest children...
    studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, form more stable families of their own. We know this works. So let's do what works and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind."

    President Barack Obama
    State of the Union, February 12, 2013


    President Obama called on Congress to expand high-quality preschool for all children.

    His proposal includes the following:

    Cost sharing partnership with states to expand preschool to all low and moderate income four year olds who reside in families at or below 200% of poverty. He envisions expansion of publicly funded preschool programs for four year olds and expansion of Head Start for three year olds.

    NAFCC supports the expansion of publicly funded preschool for four year olds and Head Start for three year olds and believes that accredited family child care providers should play an integral part in this expansion through contracting and partnerships.

    States would be required to meet quality benchmarks that are linked to better outcomes for children, which include: state-level standards for early learning; qualified teachers for all preschool classrooms; and a plan to implement comprehensive data and assessment systems.

    NAFCC Accreditation is recognized as the highest indicator that a family child care program is a quality environment. In states where Quality Rating Systems have been implemented, NAFCC Accreditation is often the "top" level in the rating system.

    Preschool programs across the states would meet common and consistent standards for quality across all programs, including: well-trained teachers, who are paid comparably to K-12 staff; small class sizes and low adult to child ratios; a rigorous curriculum; comprehensive health and related services; and effective evaluation and review of programs.

    The President will also launch a new Early Head Start-Child Care Partnership program.

    NAFCC believes that accredited family child care homes are the most natural setting for our nation's youngest children. The low child adult ratio, home-like setting, and consistent care giver enable children to build trusting relationships that open up their curiosity to learning about themselves and their environment. Family child care partnerships with Early Head Start grantees are the perfect fit for children and providers. Through these partnerships, providers continue to develop their knowledge of young children through professional development, mentoring and coaching, and on-going evaluation and review.

    NAFCC encourages members to reach out and share your ideas with President Obama and Congress to make sure family child care is central to this historic expansion in early care and education.

    How you can write or call the White House. We look forward to hearing from you!



  • #2
    Years ago I was part of a family child care Head Start pilot project. We had to meet the same standards as HS. It only lasted 2 yrs. in my area. I do think it is still around, as I have read reference to it.

    I am not sure how I feel about all the above info...some positive, some negative!

    Comment


    • #3
      Barf.



      The problem with sending one's opinion is he doesn't give a rip what the people think.

      He has his own agenda and thinks he's always right about everything. You could have 100% of providers in this country screaming nay and he'd still claim the majority held his exact beliefs.

      His attempts at more gun control are a good example of this. He claims it's something EVERYONE wants.....yet look at how the masses are storming firearm dealers to buy up more firearms and ammunition. Conceal/carry classes are maxing out and people are willing openly stating they'd rather go to jail that give up their rights.

      Yet he completely ignores ALL of them.

      There is no open discussion about anything. If he thinks it's so then it is.


      Not sure if he's ignorant or just plain arrogant........either way he doesn't care about what the American people ACTUALLY want.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Willow View Post
        Barf.



        The problem with sending one's opinion is he doesn't give a rip what the people think.

        He has his own agenda and thinks he's always right about everything. You could have 100% of providers in this country screaming nay and he'd still claim the majority held his exact beliefs.

        His attempts at more gun control are a good example of this. He claims it's something EVERYONE wants.....yet look at how the masses are storming firearm dealers to buy up more firearms and ammunition. Conceal/carry classes are maxing out and people are willing openly stating they'd rather go to jail that give up their rights.

        Yet he completely ignores ALL of them.

        There is no open discussion about anything. If he thinks it's so then it is.


        Not sure if he's ignorant or just plain arrogant........either way he doesn't care about what the American people ACTUALLY want.
        You hit the nail on the head-same thing with Obamacare!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Willow View Post
          Barf.



          The problem with sending one's opinion is he doesn't give a rip what the people think.

          He has his own agenda and thinks he's always right about everything. You could have 100% of providers in this country screaming nay and he'd still claim the majority held his exact beliefs.

          His attempts at more gun control are a good example of this. He claims it's something EVERYONE wants.....yet look at how the masses are storming firearm dealers to buy up more firearms and ammunition. Conceal/carry classes are maxing out and people are willing openly stating they'd rather go to jail that give up their rights.

          Yet he completely ignores ALL of them.

          There is no open discussion about anything. If he thinks it's so then it is.


          Not sure if he's ignorant or just plain arrogant........either way he doesn't care about what the American people ACTUALLY want.
          That should not stop you from voicing your opinion IMO. If you are against making these changes you cannot complain when they happen if you did not at least try to make your voice heard.

          Whether any of us are for or against we should be letting our legislators know what we think, both on the state and national level.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MyAngels View Post
            NAFCC believes that accredited family child care homes are the most natural setting for our nation's youngest children. The low child adult ratio, home-like setting, and consistent care giver enable children to build trusting relationships that open up their curiosity to learning about themselves and their environment. Family child care partnerships with Early Head Start grantees are the perfect fit for children and providers. Through these partnerships, providers continue to develop their knowledge of young children through professional development, mentoring and coaching, and on-going evaluation and review.

            Explained:

            Licensed home providers are too stupid to manage their own curriculum's or the children in their care alone....the government *has* to have their nose in everything or children everywhere will grow up morons who are unprepared to deal with the world as adults.

            We need this, because no one but the government can raise happy, intelligent and successful people

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MyAngels View Post
              That should not stop you from voicing your opinion IMO. If you are against making these changes you cannot complain when they happen if you did not at least try to make your voice heard.

              Whether any of us are for or against we should be letting our legislators know what we think, both on the state and national level.

              I don't disagree, nor was I trying to shoot the messenger love


              Just venting more than anything.

              I get so sick of hearing NO ONE in support of all his junk socialist agendas, everyone trying to stop him, and him continuing to plow through anyway.

              I have NO CLUE how he managed to get elected a second term.....I don't like to think about the possible reasons........

              Comment


              • #8
                Im not seeing the big deal. I have read it over three times already before replying. Can some explain to me why people don't want this passed?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Willow View Post
                  Explained:

                  Licensed home providers are too stupid to manage their own curriculum's or the children in their care alone....the government *has* to have their nose in everything or children everywhere will grow up morons who are unprepared to deal with the world as adults.

                  We need this, because no one but the government can raise happy, intelligent and successful people
                  I don't think that is what is being said at all. What is being said is that we need HIGHER QUALITY family child care programs that support children's early learning. As an assessor conducting FCCERS, ECERS and ITERS on over 100 programs I can say that there are FAR more poor quality FCCH that are doing significant damage to children than there are high quality programs that offer developmentally appropriate environments and "curriculum".

                  I also see it being offered as a partnership, whereas the government will assist providers in making quality improvements to their programs. I DO NOT beleive that the government is trying to oust FCC providers or take over their programs.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Willow View Post
                    I don't disagree, nor was I trying to shoot the messenger love
                    No problem, I totally understand .

                    I'm a big believer in letting our opinions be heard by our representatives in government - even if I didn't vote for them ::.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Willow View Post
                      I don't disagree, nor was I trying to shoot the messenger love


                      Just venting more than anything.

                      I get so sick of hearing NO ONE in support of all his junk socialist agendas, everyone trying to stop him, and him continuing to plow through anyway. I am SOME ONE and I do support Obama. He may have made some mistakes, but who in life hasn't? He also had a HUGE mess to clean up coming into his presidency....Bush practically singlehandedly destroyed our country, yet Obama is the monster in the closet

                      I have NO CLUE how he managed to get elected a second term.....I don't like to think about the possible reasons........He was elected a second term because the MAJORITY do support him.
                      I replied above.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Here in Ontario, Canada all children who turn 4 by Dec 31 of the school year they enroll in are entitled to start Junior Kindergarten. This is a government funded part of the school system.

                        All I am reading here is that kids who are offered a similar opportunity do well in life. I don't see anything bad in that.

                        I guess if your daycare base was solely 4 year olds and you were breaking your back to provide an enriching environment for them then I could see why you might feel slighted but really all that is being suggested, in my opinion is that the school system steps up, starts a bit younger and the government pays for it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Candy View Post
                          Im not seeing the big deal. I have read it over three times already before replying. Can some explain to me why people don't want this passed?

                          It's money this country doesn't have, to put into a program that's already proven not to work, and even more government intrusion that the vast majority of providers do not want.

                          Kids need to learn through play when they're toddlers, not be pushed to learn things they should be learning K-2nd/3rd grade. I could teach the kids in my care algebra when they're here *or* I could teach them manners, respect, self care/help skills and how to control their emotions so they can actually do something productive with the algebra they learn someday.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Quote:
                            Originally Posted by MyAngels
                            NAFCC believes that accredited family child care homes are the most natural setting for our nation's youngest children. The low child adult ratio, home-like setting, and consistent care giver enable children to build trusting relationships that open up their curiosity to learning about themselves and their environment. Family child care partnerships with Early Head Start grantees are the perfect fit for children and providers. Through these partnerships, providers continue to develop their knowledge of young children through professional development, mentoring and coaching, and on-going evaluation and review.

                            Explained:

                            Licensed home providers are too stupid to manage their own curriculum's or the children in their care alone....the government *has* to have their nose in everything or children everywhere will grow up morons who are unprepared to deal with the world as adults.

                            We need this, because no one but the government can raise happy, intelligent and successful people


                            You said it perfectly Willow!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by canadiancare View Post
                              Here in Ontario, Canada all children who turn 4 by Dec 31 of the school year they enroll in are entitled to start Junior Kindergarten. This is a government funded part of the school system.

                              All I am reading here is that kids who are offered a similar opportunity do well in life. I don't see anything bad in that.

                              I guess if your daycare base was solely 4 year olds and you were breaking your back to provide an enriching environment for them then I could see why you might feel slighted but really all that is being suggested, in my opinion is that the school system steps up, starts a bit younger and the government pays for it.
                              No, the people pay for it. The government does not.

                              We don't have money for this. We have a broken public school system so why add to that?!?!

                              I support early education but I also know there is NO significant proof that children who have early childhood education do any better than the next kid who didn't have it. (with the exception of low income children)

                              I think that what early childhood aged children need is more face time with their parents, more enriched quality care NOT education.

                              The money for this would be far better spent if it was for mothers (and fathers) to have longer maternity leaves, more education on health, safety and quality parenting skills.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X