I have been reading a lot about this topic lately and I wanted to open this up for opinions (hopefully opposite of mine to learn something new. lovethis). Is the Village lost? Are we simply a changing culture? Is it for the best or worse? Did the Village even exist for us to begin with? Did we adapt to self care because it was already gone? Are readily available public resources replacing the Village with no strings attached?
"It may take a village to raise a child but no one cares about the village once the child is born, as the world around ceases to exist."
"Our ancestors have been addicted to honor, craved virtue and wealth, been hooked on conquest, and on God. But ours is the first civilization to find its deep fulfillment in our descendants."
"Successive governments have forced parents to become entrepreneurs on behalf of their individual children, we haven't got time to change the world because we are too busy making sure the kids are OK. So we absolutely rely on this idea that they must fulfil us, which is rather insulting to the child-free."
"Somewhere in the midst of this we must see how the links between the generations are unraveling. Some of these links felt more like chains and, as women became more independent, they broke. But many are weakened by the need for two wages to bring up a family and the idealization of individual self-contained nuclear families."
"History suggests the young must shoulder the burden of the old, but they already do, taking on debts for the basics in a situation not of their making. Has it really come to this stark choice? We care for our elders or for our children?"
"It may take a village to raise a child but no one cares about the village once the child is born, as the world around ceases to exist."
"Our ancestors have been addicted to honor, craved virtue and wealth, been hooked on conquest, and on God. But ours is the first civilization to find its deep fulfillment in our descendants."
"Successive governments have forced parents to become entrepreneurs on behalf of their individual children, we haven't got time to change the world because we are too busy making sure the kids are OK. So we absolutely rely on this idea that they must fulfil us, which is rather insulting to the child-free."
"Somewhere in the midst of this we must see how the links between the generations are unraveling. Some of these links felt more like chains and, as women became more independent, they broke. But many are weakened by the need for two wages to bring up a family and the idealization of individual self-contained nuclear families."
"History suggests the young must shoulder the burden of the old, but they already do, taking on debts for the basics in a situation not of their making. Has it really come to this stark choice? We care for our elders or for our children?"
Comment