I thought this was in the "how long can you keep a child in time out" thread but couldn't find it so I'll just start a new thread.
Somewhere the other day, someone mentioned that part of their discipline process for things like hitting was making the offender apologize to the victim.
I've never forced anyone to apologize. But I've been told I'm dead wrong on my reasoning, but here it is anyway.
The first reason I don't is that I think it's yet another violation of the victim. Most places that make the offender apologize also make the victim respond kindly to the offender once the apology is made. To my way of thinking, the victim should be able to choose to ignore the offender. Maybe they aren't ready to talk to the child that just wacked them with a plastic truck. If the apology is forced, the victim knows the child doesn't really feel sorry about what they did.
The second reason is that, for the offender, a forced apology is completely empty of meaning. And in some cases, it's just a way to get back to playing with the group. They feel nothing for the child they hurt, they just want to go back to playing with their friends or the toys.
I guess, to me, there should be no apology unless the child wants to apologize. Sometimes I might ask a child if they would like to apologize if our conversation leads me to believe they are sorry for what they did. I do this because they may just have not thought about it yet. They're kids and just got in trouble for something so their focus may just not have swung from themselves to the victim yet.
I know that, as caregivers, we are supposed to teach children how to be successful in society and part of that is teaching them the norms and values of society, but is forcing them to do it really teaching them? And why is it that those that have told me that I'm wrong have never been able to explain why I'm wrong? If I am wrong, which has happened
, I would really like to know the reason.
Somewhere the other day, someone mentioned that part of their discipline process for things like hitting was making the offender apologize to the victim.
I've never forced anyone to apologize. But I've been told I'm dead wrong on my reasoning, but here it is anyway.
The first reason I don't is that I think it's yet another violation of the victim. Most places that make the offender apologize also make the victim respond kindly to the offender once the apology is made. To my way of thinking, the victim should be able to choose to ignore the offender. Maybe they aren't ready to talk to the child that just wacked them with a plastic truck. If the apology is forced, the victim knows the child doesn't really feel sorry about what they did.
The second reason is that, for the offender, a forced apology is completely empty of meaning. And in some cases, it's just a way to get back to playing with the group. They feel nothing for the child they hurt, they just want to go back to playing with their friends or the toys.
I guess, to me, there should be no apology unless the child wants to apologize. Sometimes I might ask a child if they would like to apologize if our conversation leads me to believe they are sorry for what they did. I do this because they may just have not thought about it yet. They're kids and just got in trouble for something so their focus may just not have swung from themselves to the victim yet.
I know that, as caregivers, we are supposed to teach children how to be successful in society and part of that is teaching them the norms and values of society, but is forcing them to do it really teaching them? And why is it that those that have told me that I'm wrong have never been able to explain why I'm wrong? If I am wrong, which has happened
![Smile](https://chat.daycare.com/core/images/smilies/smile.png)
Comment